by James
(San Jacinto, CA, USA)
I'm designing a house suited to the lower elevation Hawaiian climate (Big Island). The walls are, for the most part, Textilene 90 screening. You could live in a tent in many places, so my object was to build a house that would be as close to a tent as possible.
The first problem I encountered was the requirement for railings inside any screen room if the floor level was more than 30 inches above the ground. Given code requirements, that was guaranteed. Naturally I don't want railings inside the house, so I came up with the idea of running a low, 5' wide detached deck around the perimeter of the house. This would reduce the fall from the floor to less than 30 inches and remove the need for railings. This was confirmed by the permit review manager at the building department.
Detached decks less than 30" above the ground are permit exempt, but the IRC states that permit exempt structures must be built according to code (I suspect the IBC does, as well), and here is where the footing problem enters the picture. The Hawaii County Code says that all footings must be 16" square, and the IRC says that all footings must be a foot deep. Adding on the required 6" ground to wood distance, I wind up with the same footings I'll have under my house (3 cubic feet of concrete), only fifty of them. All that for a glorified walkway.
I know this isn't correct, for an 8x10 storage shed (also permit exempt) would require 8 of the monsters, and no one does that.
Has anyone encountered something in the code that reduces the footing requirements for small structures?
Thanks in advance
Comments for Little deck with big footings?
|
||
|
||